BEGIN:VCALENDAR
PRODID:ARRTI-Veranstaltungen
VERSION:2.0
X-WR-CALNAME:ARRTI-Veranstaltungen
NAME:ARRTI-Veranstaltungen
REFRESH-INTERVAL;VALUE=DURATION:PT12H
X-PUBLISHED-TTL:PT12H
BEGIN:VTIMEZONE
TZID:Europe/Berlin
TZURL:http://tzurl.org/zoneinfo-outlook/Europe/Berlin
X-LIC-LOCATION:Europe/Berlin
BEGIN:DAYLIGHT
TZOFFSETFROM:+0100
TZOFFSETTO:+0200
TZNAME:CEST
DTSTART:19700329T020000
RRULE:FREQ=YEARLY;BYMONTH=3;BYDAY=-1SU
END:DAYLIGHT
BEGIN:STANDARD
TZOFFSETFROM:+0200
TZOFFSETTO:+0100
TZNAME:CET
DTSTART:19701025T030000
RRULE:FREQ=YEARLY;BYMONTH=10;BYDAY=-1SU
END:STANDARD
END:VTIMEZONE
BEGIN:VEVENT
UID: 62673
DTSTAMP:20261011T132648Z
SUMMARY:ARRTI-Sprechstunde
X-ALT-DESC;FMTTYPE=text/html:<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 
 3.2//EN"><HTML><HEAD><TITLE></TITLE></HEAD><BODY>ARRTI-Sprechstunde<br>G 
 eb. 05.21 1. OG, Kaiserstr. 26, 76133 Karlsruhe<br><br><div><br><p>Sie 
 haben Fragen zu <strong>ARRTI</strong>, unseren 
 <strong>Angeboten</strong> oder zu 
 <strong>Kooperationsm&ouml;glichkeiten</strong>? <br /><br>Dann besuchen 
 Sie unsere monatliche <strong>ARRTI-Sprechstunde</strong>! 
 </p><br></div><br><br><div><br><p>&#128197; <strong>Wann:</strong> Jeder 
 <strong>erste Mittwoch im Monat</strong>, 9:00&ndash;10:00 Uhr <br 
 /><br>&#128205; <strong>Wo:</strong> Geb. 05.21 1. OG, Kaiserstr. 26, 
 76133 Karlsruhe</p><br></div><br><br><div><br><p>Die Sprechstunde 
 richtet sich an alle am KIT: <strong>Studierende, Lehrende, Forschende 
 und Gr&uuml;nder:innen.</strong> 
 </p><br></div><br><br><div><br><p>Nutzen Sie die Gelegenheit, um mit uns 
 ins Gespr&auml;ch zu kommen &uuml;ber: <br /><br>&bull; Fragen zu 
 bestehenden ARRTI-Lehrangeboten <br /><br>&bull; M&ouml;glichkeiten zur 
 Integration zugeschnittener Module oder Veranstaltungen in Ihren 
 Studiengang <br /><br>&bull; Einbindung von ARRTI-Angeboten 
 beispielsweise in Ihre Lehrveranstaltung, Graduiertenprogramme oder 
 Forschungsgruppe <br /><br>&bull; Unterst&uuml;tzung bei der ethischen 
 Reflexion Ihrer Forschung und der Vermittlung entsprechender 
 Ansprechpartner:innen <br /><br>&bull; Kooperationen in 
 Drittmittelantr&auml;gen </p><br></div><br><br><div><br><p>&#9749; 
 W&auml;hrend der Sprechstunde stehen <strong>Kaffee, Tee und 
 Kekse</strong> bereit &ndash; wir freuen uns auf den Austausch in 
 angenehmer Atmosph&auml;re! </p><br></div><br><br><div><br><p>&#128233; 
 <strong>Anmeldung:</strong> per E-Mail an <a class="Hyperlink 
 SCXW222078696 BCX2" href="mailto:nico.braehler@kit.edu" rel="noreferrer 
 noopener" style="text-decoration: none; color: inherit;" 
 target="_blank">nico.braehler@kit.edu</a> oder einfach spontan 
 vorbeikommen.</p><br></div><br></BODY></HTML>
DESCRIPTION: ARRTI-Sprechstunde\nGeb. 05.21 1. OG, Kaiserstr. 26, 76133
 Karlsruhe\n\n<div>\n<p>Sie haben Fragen zu <strong>ARRTI</strong>,
 unseren <strong>Angeboten</strong> oder zu
 <strong>Kooperationsmöglichkeiten</strong>? <br />\nDann besuchen Sie
 unsere monatliche <strong>ARRTI-Sprechstunde</strong>!
 </p>\n</div>\n\n<div>\n<p>📅 <strong>Wann:</strong> Jeder
 <strong>erste Mittwoch im Monat</strong>, 9:00–10:00 Uhr <br />\n📍
 <strong>Wo:</strong> Geb. 05.21 1. OG, Kaiserstr. 26, 76133
 Karlsruhe</p>\n</div>\n\n<div>\n<p>Die Sprechstunde richtet sich an alle
 am KIT: <strong>Studierende, Lehrende, Forschende und
 Gründer:innen.</strong> </p>\n</div>\n\n<div>\n<p>Nutzen Sie die
 Gelegenheit, um mit uns ins Gespräch zu kommen über: <br />\n•
 Fragen zu bestehenden ARRTI-Lehrangeboten <br />\n• Möglichkeiten zur
 Integration zugeschnittener Module oder Veranstaltungen in Ihren
 Studiengang <br />\n• Einbindung von ARRTI-Angeboten beispielsweise in
 Ihre Lehrveranstaltung, Graduiertenprogramme oder Forschungsgruppe <br
 />\n• Unterstützung bei der ethischen Reflexion Ihrer Forschung und
 der Vermittlung entsprechender Ansprechpartner:innen <br />\n•
 Kooperationen in Drittmittelanträgen </p>\n</div>\n\n<div>\n<p>☕
 Während der Sprechstunde stehen <strong>Kaffee, Tee und Kekse</strong>
 bereit – wir freuen uns auf den Austausch in angenehmer Atmosphäre!
 </p>\n</div>\n\n<div>\n<p>📩 <strong>Anmeldung:</strong> per E-Mail an
 <a class="Hyperlink SCXW222078696 BCX2"
 href="mailto:nico.braehler@kit.edu" rel="noreferrer noopener"
 style="text-decoration: none; color: inherit;"
 target="_blank">nico.braehler@kit.edu</a> oder einfach spontan
 vorbeikommen.</p>\n</div>\n
DTSTART;TZID=Europe/Berlin:20261104T090000
DTEND;TZID=Europe/Berlin:20261104T100000
LOCATION:Geb. 05.21 1. OG, Kaiserstr. 26, 76133 Karlsruhe
END:VEVENT
BEGIN:VEVENT
UID: 61937
DTSTAMP:20261011T132648Z
SUMMARY:Security‑Relevant Research in Academia – Debates, Definitions, and
 Best‑Practices
X-ALT-DESC;FMTTYPE=text/html:<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 
 3.2//EN"><HTML><HEAD><TITLE></TITLE></HEAD><BODY>Security&#8209;Relevant 
 Research in Academia &ndash; Debates, Definitions, and 
 Best&#8209;Practices<br>TBA<br><br><div><br><div><br><p>Universities 
 stand at the intersection of open inquiry and societal responsibility. 
 In light of the war in Ukraine, which has starkly illustrated how 
 quickly scientific advances can be repurposed for conflict, research 
 that touches national security&mdash;whether in cryptography, 
 dual&#8209;use technologies, or emerging weapon systems&mdash;carries 
 especially high stakes. This workshop seeks to bring together scholars, 
 administrators, ethicists, and policy makers to explore the complex 
 terrain of security&#8209;relevant research (SRR) within 
 higher&#8209;education institutions. 
 </p><br></div><br><br><div><br><p>We aim to frame the conversation 
 around fundamental questions such as: 
 </p><br></div><br><br><div><br><ul><br>	<li><br>	<p>What qualifies as 
 security&#8209;relevant research? 
 </p><br>	</li><br></ul><br></div><br></div><br><br><div><br><div><br><ul 
 ><br>	<li><br>	<p>What processes and structures should be a part of 
 universities to enable the responsible conducting of SRR? 
 </p><br>	</li><br></ul><br></div><br><br><div><br><ul><br>	<li><br>	<p>W 
 hat responsibilities do individual researchers have regarding SRR? 
 </p><br>	</li><br></ul><br></div><br><br><div><br><ul><br>	<li><br>	<p>I 
 n what ways do contemporary funding structures and government contracts 
 influence visibility and scrutiny of SRR? 
 </p><br>	</li><br></ul><br></div><br><br><div><br><p>Advocates emphasize 
 that academic freedom fuels innovation, peer review safeguards rigor, 
 and university&#8209;based research can offer transparent, ethical 
 alternatives to opaque military labs. Critics highlight concerns about 
 accelerating arms races, exposing students to dual&#8209;use dilemmas, 
 and creating conflicts of interest with industry or defense 
 sponsors.&#8239; </p><br></div><br><br><div><br><p>One goal of the 
 workshop is that the insights, case studies, and draft guidelines 
 generated during the workshop could later be assembled into an edited 
 volume. The aim is to capture the diverse perspectives and emerging 
 best&#8209;practice recommendations in a scholarly collection that can 
 serve as a reference for institutions grappling with 
 security&#8209;relevant research. 
 </p><br></div><br></div><br></BODY></HTML>
DESCRIPTION: Security‑Relevant Research in Academia – Debates,
 Definitions, and Best‑Practices\nTBA\n\n<div>\n<div>\n<p>Universities
 stand at the intersection of open inquiry and societal responsibility.
 In light of the war in Ukraine, which has starkly illustrated how
 quickly scientific advances can be repurposed for conflict, research
 that touches national security—whether in cryptography, dual‑use
 technologies, or emerging weapon systems—carries especially high
 stakes. This workshop seeks to bring together scholars, administrators,
 ethicists, and policy makers to explore the complex terrain of
 security‑relevant research (SRR) within higher‑education
 institutions. </p>\n</div>\n\n<div>\n<p>We aim to frame the conversation
 around fundamental questions such as:
 </p>\n</div>\n\n<div>\n<ul>\n	<li>\n	<p>What qualifies as
 security‑relevant research?
 </p>\n	</li>\n</ul>\n</div>\n</div>\n\n<div>\n<div>\n<ul>\n	<li>\n	<p>Wh
 at processes and structures should be a part of universities to enable
 the responsible conducting of SRR?
 </p>\n	</li>\n</ul>\n</div>\n\n<div>\n<ul>\n	<li>\n	<p>What
 responsibilities do individual researchers have regarding SRR?
 </p>\n	</li>\n</ul>\n</div>\n\n<div>\n<ul>\n	<li>\n	<p>In what ways do
 contemporary funding structures and government contracts influence
 visibility and scrutiny of SRR?
 </p>\n	</li>\n</ul>\n</div>\n\n<div>\n<p>Advocates emphasize that
 academic freedom fuels innovation, peer review safeguards rigor, and
 university‑based research can offer transparent, ethical alternatives
 to opaque military labs. Critics highlight concerns about accelerating
 arms races, exposing students to dual‑use dilemmas, and creating
 conflicts of interest with industry or defense sponsors. 
 </p>\n</div>\n\n<div>\n<p>One goal of the workshop is that the insights,
 case studies, and draft guidelines generated during the workshop could
 later be assembled into an edited volume. The aim is to capture the
 diverse perspectives and emerging best‑practice recommendations in a
 scholarly collection that can serve as a reference for institutions
 grappling with security‑relevant research. </p>\n</div>\n</div>\n
DTSTART;TZID=Europe/Berlin:20261105T090000
DTEND;TZID=Europe/Berlin:20261105T181500
LOCATION:TBA
END:VEVENT
BEGIN:VEVENT
UID: 61938
DTSTAMP:20261011T132648Z
SUMMARY:Security‑Relevant Research in Academia – Debates, Definitions, and
 Best‑Practices
X-ALT-DESC;FMTTYPE=text/html:<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 
 3.2//EN"><HTML><HEAD><TITLE></TITLE></HEAD><BODY>Security&#8209;Relevant 
 Research in Academia &ndash; Debates, Definitions, and 
 Best&#8209;Practices<br>TBA<br><br><div><br><div><br><p>Universities 
 stand at the intersection of open inquiry and societal responsibility. 
 In light of the war in Ukraine, which has starkly illustrated how 
 quickly scientific advances can be repurposed for conflict, research 
 that touches national security&mdash;whether in cryptography, 
 dual&#8209;use technologies, or emerging weapon systems&mdash;carries 
 especially high stakes. This workshop seeks to bring together scholars, 
 administrators, ethicists, and policy makers to explore the complex 
 terrain of security&#8209;relevant research (SRR) within 
 higher&#8209;education institutions. 
 </p><br></div><br><br><div><br><p>We aim to frame the conversation 
 around fundamental questions such as: 
 </p><br></div><br><br><div><br><ul><br>	<li><br>	<p>What qualifies as 
 security&#8209;relevant research? 
 </p><br>	</li><br></ul><br></div><br></div><br><br><div><br><div><br><ul 
 ><br>	<li><br>	<p>What processes and structures should be a part of 
 universities to enable the responsible conducting of SRR? 
 </p><br>	</li><br></ul><br></div><br><br><div><br><ul><br>	<li><br>	<p>W 
 hat responsibilities do individual researchers have regarding SRR? 
 </p><br>	</li><br></ul><br></div><br><br><div><br><ul><br>	<li><br>	<p>I 
 n what ways do contemporary funding structures and government contracts 
 influence visibility and scrutiny of SRR? 
 </p><br>	</li><br></ul><br></div><br><br><div><br><p>Advocates emphasize 
 that academic freedom fuels innovation, peer review safeguards rigor, 
 and university&#8209;based research can offer transparent, ethical 
 alternatives to opaque military labs. Critics highlight concerns about 
 accelerating arms races, exposing students to dual&#8209;use dilemmas, 
 and creating conflicts of interest with industry or defense 
 sponsors.&#8239; </p><br></div><br><br><div><br><p>One goal of the 
 workshop is that the insights, case studies, and draft guidelines 
 generated during the workshop could later be assembled into an edited 
 volume. The aim is to capture the diverse perspectives and emerging 
 best&#8209;practice recommendations in a scholarly collection that can 
 serve as a reference for institutions grappling with 
 security&#8209;relevant research. 
 </p><br></div><br></div><br></BODY></HTML>
DESCRIPTION: Security‑Relevant Research in Academia – Debates,
 Definitions, and Best‑Practices\nTBA\n\n<div>\n<div>\n<p>Universities
 stand at the intersection of open inquiry and societal responsibility.
 In light of the war in Ukraine, which has starkly illustrated how
 quickly scientific advances can be repurposed for conflict, research
 that touches national security—whether in cryptography, dual‑use
 technologies, or emerging weapon systems—carries especially high
 stakes. This workshop seeks to bring together scholars, administrators,
 ethicists, and policy makers to explore the complex terrain of
 security‑relevant research (SRR) within higher‑education
 institutions. </p>\n</div>\n\n<div>\n<p>We aim to frame the conversation
 around fundamental questions such as:
 </p>\n</div>\n\n<div>\n<ul>\n	<li>\n	<p>What qualifies as
 security‑relevant research?
 </p>\n	</li>\n</ul>\n</div>\n</div>\n\n<div>\n<div>\n<ul>\n	<li>\n	<p>Wh
 at processes and structures should be a part of universities to enable
 the responsible conducting of SRR?
 </p>\n	</li>\n</ul>\n</div>\n\n<div>\n<ul>\n	<li>\n	<p>What
 responsibilities do individual researchers have regarding SRR?
 </p>\n	</li>\n</ul>\n</div>\n\n<div>\n<ul>\n	<li>\n	<p>In what ways do
 contemporary funding structures and government contracts influence
 visibility and scrutiny of SRR?
 </p>\n	</li>\n</ul>\n</div>\n\n<div>\n<p>Advocates emphasize that
 academic freedom fuels innovation, peer review safeguards rigor, and
 university‑based research can offer transparent, ethical alternatives
 to opaque military labs. Critics highlight concerns about accelerating
 arms races, exposing students to dual‑use dilemmas, and creating
 conflicts of interest with industry or defense sponsors. 
 </p>\n</div>\n\n<div>\n<p>One goal of the workshop is that the insights,
 case studies, and draft guidelines generated during the workshop could
 later be assembled into an edited volume. The aim is to capture the
 diverse perspectives and emerging best‑practice recommendations in a
 scholarly collection that can serve as a reference for institutions
 grappling with security‑relevant research. </p>\n</div>\n</div>\n
DTSTART;TZID=Europe/Berlin:20261106T090000
DTEND;TZID=Europe/Berlin:20261106T181500
LOCATION:TBA
END:VEVENT
END:VCALENDAR
